In her article, 男女操逼视频软件淟egal Professional Privilege in a Digital World: A Comparative Analysis,男女操逼视频软件 published in Volume 15 of the British Journal of American Legal Studies(Spring 2025), Pace Haub Law Professor Lissa Griffin and co-author Dan Jasinski explore the evolving challenges to legal professional privilege in an increasingly digitized criminal justice system.
Focusing on the United States and England & Wales, the article analyzes how the routine use of technology男女操逼视频软件攅mail, cloud storage, mobile devices男女操逼视频软件攊ntroduces new vulnerabilities in client-lawyer confidentiality. The authors examine the risks of interception, device searches, and the erosion of traditional protections, arguing for heightened awareness among practitioners and a rethinking of judicial and legislative approaches to digital-era privilege
男女操逼视频软件淚ncreased digitalisation of a lawyer's routine tasks poses increased risks to their client's interests,男女操逼视频软件 they write, calling on courts and lawmakers to preserve the core principles of adversarial justice by protecting this foundational ethical duty.
In his article, The 'Realness' Key to Compelled Passcode Production, published in the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology (Vol. 115, 2025), Pace Haub Law Visiting Assistant Professor Gabriel Pell offers a novel framework for applying the Fifth Amendment男女操逼视频软件檚 Foregone Conclusion exception to compelled passcode entry.
In her article, Representing Climate Wreckers, published in the NYU Environmental Law Journal (2025), Pace | Haub Environmental Law Professor Camila Bustos examines the ethical responsibilities of attorneys representing fossil fuel companies男女操逼视频软件攖ermed "climate wreckers"男女操逼视频软件攁nd argues for a reevaluation of professional conduct standards in light of the climate crisis.
In his article, The Sound of Science in Major Questions Doctrine Jurisprudence, published in Natural Resources & Environment (ABA, Spring 2025), Pace | Haub Environmental Law Professor Josh Galperin (with co-author Terra Baer) examines how the U.S. Supreme Court男女操逼视频软件檚 use of the major questions doctrine undermines core constitutional and statutory principles男女操逼视频软件攑articularly when the Court treats congressional silence as legislative intent.